Under a minimalist definition of democracy, rulers are elected through competitive elections while more expansive definitions link democracy to guarantees of civil liberties and human rights in addition to competitive elections.
Explanation
The statement presents a distinction that is widely recognized in political theory regarding the concept of democracy. A minimalist definition of democracy focuses solely on the electoral process, emphasizing that legitimate rulers are those elected through free and fair elections. This has been supported by various scholarly articles, including those found in the search results, such as Bidner's work on minimalist democracy. Conversely, more expansive definitions incorporate elements such as civil liberties, human rights, and the rule of law, which enrich the understanding of what constitutes a democratic society. This broader interpretation is also prevalent in discussions about democratic governance and includes conditions that ensure not just the selection of leaders, but also the protection of individual rights and freedoms. Therefore, the statement accurately reflects a well-established theoretical framework in democracy studies and is corroborated by academic literature and relevant discussions.
Key Points
- The statement differentiates between minimalist and expansive definitions of democracy, which is a recognized distinction in political theory.
- Minimalist democracy emphasizes competitive elections as the primary criterion for democracy.
- Expansive definitions of democracy include civil liberties and human rights, showcasing a broader understanding of democratic governance.
