The study showed that “Quantitative analysis revealed that the accuracy of drug information in Wikipedia was 99.7%±0.2% than the textbook data.
Explanation
Upon examining the provided details and referencing the study "Accuracy and completeness of drug information in Wikipedia" by J Kräenbring (2014), it is clear that the statement is improperly worded, specifically the phrase "was 99.7%±0.2% than the textbook data." The accurate interpretation from the study is that the precision of drug information on Wikipedia was indeed measured at 99.7% ± 0.2% when compared to traditional textbook sources. Therefore, while the accuracy figure is accurate, the grammatical construction of the statement misrepresents the intended content, leading to confusion. The original findings highlight a high level of accuracy, supporting the validity of Wikipedia as a usable source for drug information, although it may not explicitly replace professional medical guidance. Thus, while the statistical data itself is supported, the phrasing is misleading.
Key Points
- The accuracy of drug information on Wikipedia was indeed reported at 99.7%±0.2% compared to textbook data.
- The phrase 'than' should be replaced with 'when compared to' for grammatical accuracy.
- The high level of accuracy suggests Wikipedia can be a reliable source for drug information, but should not substitute professional medical advice.
