In an internal notice, NetEase admitted that an anti-graft investigation revealed the incidents occurred primarily within those departments.
Explanation
The claim that NetEase admitted to an anti-graft investigation revealing incidents occurring primarily within specific departments is supported by recent news articles indicating that the company has charged nine employees with bribery and money laundering as a result of such an investigation. However, there is no explicit mention in the sources that NetEase confirmed the locations of these incidents to be 'primarily within those departments' as stated. The use of "primarily" adds an interpretation that isn't directly backed by the sources. The language used seems to be an interpretation or extrapolation of the facts instead of a direct quote or explicit claim made by NetEase in their announcements. The news coverage does indicate wrongdoing within the company, but the extent and specifics of the departments involved lacks detailed confirmation. Hence, while the statement contains elements of truth, the lack of specific details about which departments the incidents occurred in means the statement is not entirely accurate.
Key Points
- NetEase investigated internal incidents and charged employees with bribery and money laundering.
- The claim about the confirmations of specific departments is not directly supported by available sources.
- The interpretation of 'primarily within those departments' adds a layer of assumptions not clearly stated in the reports.
