Further, those working under Yang were the ones accused of buying traffic.
Explanation
The statement references individuals working under a person named Yang being accused of buying traffic. The search results mention a legal case involving the Yang family but focus on charges related to theft of trade secrets rather than accusations regarding buying traffic. There is no direct connection made in the search results or news articles that substantiates the claim of accusations about traffic buying. Thus, while there may be a figure named Yang who is associated with legal issues, the assertion that his associates specifically were accused of buying traffic is not supported by the information provided. Therefore, the statement is misleading as it implies a specific action (buying traffic) without evidence of such an accusation being made.
Key Points
- The claim is about individuals under Yang being accused of buying traffic, which is not supported by the sources.
- The sources discuss legal charges against Yang and his family, specifically regarding the theft of trade secrets, not traffic buying.
- Without direct evidence or credible allegations regarding buying traffic, the statement is ultimately false.
